67 K GTA Fastback on Hemmings

pony65k · October 8, 2007 at 4:03 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>1967 Mustang GTA fastback, 26,000 actual miles, 289 hi-po K-code, burnt amber metallic paint, 26 coats, deluxe interior, upper & lower console, much more! $35,000; call for details & more photos. 303-466-2193, CO. $35,000<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>

Hemmings link

Anyone know anything about this one?

RP

BiffF15 · October 8, 2007 at 5:10 PM

RECOMMENDED TEMPLATE: Sold for final sale price by seller

BuyItNow set at bin price(also post BIN if there is one for comparison) <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>description here<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>

link

Looks pretty good. Was that a rare color?

pony65k · October 8, 2007 at 11:54 PM

Considering that there were only around 489 K codes in total in 67, let alone fastbacks with luxury interior, yes I would guess this was a rare colour. I haven't seen any 67 with this colour.

Anyone near the kar that would be willing to chase down some details and pics? The guys name is James V Johnson (Thank you Google).

RP

Edited by - rene.pilat on 10/09/2007 00:04:11

CharlesTurner · October 9, 2007 at 5:01 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

Looks pretty good. Was that a rare color?

Rare in numbers, yes. Desirable??? Well, dunno about that! <img src=images/icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>

round2K_old · October 9, 2007 at 6:12 AM

It appears that the listing is no longer available on ebay.

C6ZZKGT · October 9, 2007 at 8:30 AM Official Post

Dave,

The listing is actually in Hemmings, not on Ebay. There are no real details in the listing that I can see.

-Fred-

66KGT_old · October 9, 2007 at 3:45 PM

26 coats of paint? Won't that cause cracking problems later?

C6ZZKGT · October 9, 2007 at 4:01 PM Official Post

Sounds like an old school lacquer paint job.

-Fred-

davmcn_old · October 9, 2007 at 6:57 PM

It is an "A" code and the seller says that somewhere along the line a HiPo engine was put in the car

BoS_old · October 9, 2007 at 7:44 PM

I believe this is false advertising when it states

289 Hi-Po K-code, don't you guys agree?

If the car is not a K-code, i.e has a K in the

serial number it should not be advertised as such.

Just my two cents.

/Bo

pony65k · October 9, 2007 at 9:11 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

I believe this is false advertising when it states

289 Hi-Po K-code, don't you guys agree?

Definitely false advertising. Hemmings should be alerted to the fact too. Nothing worse than people trying to get away with this kind of rubbish.

My 5 cents worth )we don't have 2 cents anymore.

RP

dunc289_old · October 10, 2007 at 6:37 AM

I called twice, got a machine, and no call back.....hmmmm.<img src=images/icon_smile_question.gif border=0 align=middle>

C6ZZKGT · October 10, 2007 at 7:09 AM Official Post

I agree with Bo. The initial statement as being a "K" code does not indicate that it is purely the engine. This would even cast doubts on the engine being correct at this point.

-Fred-

round2K_old · October 10, 2007 at 12:43 PM

If this is correct, that would make this car the cousin of the "Indy Pace Car" on ebay recently.

66gtk · October 10, 2007 at 1:14 PM

It probably has a mere "Hi-PO" decal on the air cleaner. Just like the other Hi-Po car I inquired about on Craigs List locally here. Why would somebody advertise it falsly only to waste everybody's time, including the seller!?!?

Participate now!