is the shifting mechanism correct for the toploader?
iowa
is the shifting mechanism correct for the toploader?
iowa
sorry about that.
the above post made no sense,
but was referring to the 'K' toploader
on e bay.
also, my understanding, is that only the convertibles
had the little little 'tunnel';
the provision for the emergency brake cable
just ahead of the wheel house part of the floor pan.
yet my 'K' code car has these.
is it possible that they used the convert. floor
in my fastback?
thanks
iowa
Edited by - iowa on 06/05/2010 16:11:49
Not sure what you mean by different parking brake configuration? In '67 the routing changed. For 65-66, the routing should have been consistent across all 3 body styles for what was being used at any point in production.
C65
it's not the brake lines themselves i'm talking about
but the little tunnel in the rear floor pan
which they go thru on the way back to the hubs.
i thot that only the convertibles
had these 'humps' in the metal.
you can see a pic of them on pg 190
of the NPD catalog
iowa
here is a pic of what i'm talking about.
the catalog says the convertables had
this tunnel only.
but...my K-code car has them!!
[Blocked Image: http://www.surfacezero.com/g503/data/500/medium/E_brk_floor_provision_copy.jpg]
Not unique to convertibles. The catalog appears to be wrong on that.
can s.o. explain which years n types of mustangs
had this 'tunnel' for the emergency brake?
or direct me to a thread which does?
thanks
iowa
From what I have seen, appears it was used on all body styles in '65. I have seen some late '65 where the cables didn't go through the holes though. But, instead, were secured to the bottom of the floor pan, kind of like a '66 (but not the same.)
is there a good link that describes the various transmissions?
Iowa, you might want to look at David Kee's website.
The catalog is in error; that style of tunnel is found on all early cars that have the early style brake cables. The image below is of an early style cable from an unrestored 65 SJ FB. The notch in between the two pieces of rubber is where the cable bracket goes to fasten it to the frame. Inline Tube is the only company I am familiar with that sells reproductions of both the early and late-style cables. Unfortunately I don't know when the production change to place. The correct brackets and bolts are shown below courtesy of Charles' K blog spot.
[Blocked Image: http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/8707/20070127brakecable02lor.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/7733/rem11.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/2726/rem20.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/7941/531012.jpg]
Edited by - round2K on 06/11/2010 07:42:32
thanks guys
the '66 i've been tearing down
did not have these 'tunnels'
also did all '65's have the impression dip
just behind the shifter access 'square' hole?
thanks
iowa
i see this calif car on ebay for 5500
pretty good shape if as advertised.
but i think it would be criminal
if i bought it and harvested parts from it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/196…9bcfe1818#v4-37
i just don't feel comfortable doing this.
am still leaning toward a dynacorn floor
but using all the original sheet metal off
my floor that i can
iowa
Edited by - iowa on 06/11/2010 10:16:05
All 65 and 66 original floor pans have the dip behind the square shifter opening. It is where the backup light switch wires come through on a manual transmission. The Dynacorn floor pans do not have this dip. 67 and up manual transmission backup light wires were routed underneath and up the firewall so they do not have the dip.
-Fred-
the dyacorn floors for the convertibles do have this dip.
in fact, this convertible floor
is the closest one to my original flooring.
was there much difference between the
cp/FB and the convertible floors?
iowa
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
the dyacorn floors for the convertibles do have this dip.
in fact, this convertible floor
is the closest one to my original flooring.
was there much difference between the
cp/FB and the convertible floors?
iowa
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>
I've always been under the impression that the basic floor assembly was the same for all body styles. Convertibles just required additional reinforcement sections and unique seat riser. I have not had to delve into rusty projects that need floors very much, so there may be others willing to share their experiences on what they've found.
caspian65
thanks to you and others that have put up with me
and my Q's during the past month or so.
i plan to research a little more before i
decide what to do.
i'll search for and compare diferent floors
for each year and type
and hopefully be able to make a list of
all the differences.
iowa
does anyone know how much that K code tranny
went for that was on ebay recently?
thanks
iowa
$1500 including the shifter.
hmmm....
i should have bought it!
had a chance to 'buy it now' for $750
but didn't have a clue what they were worth
oh well....tomorrow's another day
dave
i removed the front suspension last night
and unfortunately did not preserve the
correct shim count for the upper arms.
is this a major problem on reassembly?
thanks
iowa
Edited by - iowa on 06/17/2010 11:50:11
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!