'65 Polished wiper blades

6hypo5conv_old · January 12, 2011 at 11:06 AM

It has been pointed out to me recently that the '65s had polished wiper blades, I am seeing only satin finish available in the catalogs.

Can the satin ones be polished or can anyone tell me where I could get a set of polished blades?

CharlesTurner · January 12, 2011 at 11:51 AM

The end that is satin on the later one might be able to be polished, but the correct finish on the later '65 style (beveled base) is chrome.

Richard P. · January 12, 2011 at 2:12 PM

If you go to any salvage yards looking for the 65 wiper arms be sure to check any early Falcons and Fairlanes as they used the the same wiper arms.

CharlesTurner · January 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM

Are we talking wiper blade retainers or wiper arms here?

6hypo5conv_old · January 12, 2011 at 5:23 PM

Blade retainers Charles.

I have looked some more and it "looks like" Scott Drake offers the polished ones.... anybody know??

I do have the correct arms on my Kar, just would like to get/have the correct polished blade retainers.

Edited by - 6hypo5conv on 01/12/2011 17:39:32

Richard P. · January 12, 2011 at 6:14 PM

Ford Motor company parts book shows part# C3AZ 17528-A (Trico) blade assy. fitting Fairlane, Falcon and Mustang.

CharlesTurner · January 12, 2011 at 7:21 PM

Ok, that helps. Like Rich says, they interchanged with other Ford's. The correct length is 15". Galaxie's and some Fairlane's used a 16".

club 33_old · January 12, 2011 at 9:52 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

Blade retainers Charles.

I have looked some more and it "looks like" Scott Drake offers the polished ones.... anybody know??

The exact original ones are not available as a reproduction. The "replacement" Trico ones are shaped differently and have a satin finish. The originals for a '65 are kind of "flat" and highly polished. Originals are not too difficult to find. There is usually nothing wrong with them other than needing polished.

Sorry, but I don't have a picture right now.

5R09ACCV_old · January 14, 2011 at 2:05 PM

I have a set on my car right now that have a curve to them. They aren't trico though, at least I don't think they are...And they aren't common from what I have seen. Does anyone have a pic of the correct wiper blades that should be on the car?

6hypo5conv_old · January 16, 2011 at 7:59 AM

I've got pictures of the correct ones a member on the VMF sent me of the ones I'm going to buy-I'll bring them over today (Sunday) and now I'm finding out that the repro arms are not accurate either.

Brant, What it the difference between SDs wip-5 and wip-6? I'm told that the arms for my '65 should be chrome "hooded" type then stainless (shiney) to the blade...

club 33_old · January 16, 2011 at 9:44 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

Brant, What it the difference between SDs wip-5 and wip-6? I'm told that the arms for my '65 should be chrome "hooded" type then stainless (shiney) to the blade...

"Wip-5" are the ones to use with the threaded studs through the cowl that use the chrome bezels there at the cowl.

"Wip-6" are the ones to use on a bit later car that does not use the chrome bezels.

Both kits have the replacement blade holder assy. as mentioned above.

I know my explanation was quick, so if you have questions, let me know.

cobraboy · January 16, 2011 at 11:36 AM

I went and looked at mine. The blade says Trico on the back. But the reference to hooded has me confused, also curved / flat. Pics would be great from someone, as it is a very prominant part in full view.

Thanks

Edited by - cobraboy on 01/16/2011 11:38:35

6hypo5conv_old · January 16, 2011 at 2:40 PM

I didn't mean to confuse the issue. Actually I have 2 issues: 1 being the BLADES themselves, but I have found the correct original stainless, flat, Tricos in 15" so I am set there.

Then I have descovered that I have incorrect/reproduction ARMS in that they have a "hood" on them right where they attach to the transmission on the cowl, and they are CHROME there, then go to a stainless finish for a few inches, then to a rather dull satin finish at the end where the BLADE attaches-I think these are more correct for a '66 but not 100% sure.

Stand by for the pictures of the correct blades I've found.

I still am unsure IF my July '65 car should have the "hood" or the smooth arms...

club 33_old · January 16, 2011 at 3:17 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

I still am unsure IF my July '65 car should have the "hood" or the smooth arms...

July '65 car should have "hooded" ones, because you do not have the bezels and nuts on the cowl.

6hypo5conv_old · January 16, 2011 at 6:20 PM

Thanks Brant, This helps!

Now is there a close reproduction of this one for '65? and are they chrome/stainless (no satin finish like '66s?)

We have been trying to FINALLY learn how to post pictures for over an hour, and the brains of the family (my Wife) is stumped-she HAS read about how to do it but doesn't understand what to put where-any help would be appreciated, then we'll post the pics of the correct '65 Trico blade holders. Thanks!

club 33_old · January 16, 2011 at 6:51 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

Thanks Brant, This helps!

Now is there a close reproduction of this one for '65? and are they chrome/stainless (no satin finish like '66s?)

We have been trying to FINALLY learn how to post pictures for over an hour, and the brains of the family (my Wife) is stumped-she HAS read about how to do it but doesn't understand what to put where-any help would be appreciated, then we'll post the pics of the correct '65 Trico blade holders. Thanks!

Yes, there is a nice reproduction available.

http://www.virginiaclassicmustang.com/65-EXACT-WIPER…NISH-P1208.aspx

http://www.virginiaclassicmustang.com/65-70-EXACT-WI…NISH-P1209.aspx

I'll try to get better pictures tomorrow.

cobraboy · January 17, 2011 at 2:50 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

Thanks Brant, This helps!

Now is there a close reproduction of this one for '65? and are they chrome/stainless (no satin finish like '66s?)

We have been trying to FINALLY learn how to post pictures for over an hour, and the brains of the family (my Wife) is stumped-she HAS read about how to do it but doesn't understand what to put where-any help would be appreciated, then we'll post the pics of the correct '65 Trico blade holders. Thanks!

I'll try.

Have the pics on your computor.

Upload your pics to a photo hosting site - ie tinypic or photobucket.

This is done by going to hosting site and clicking on the upload images button. There will be an option to choose the size, you want 640x480 or size for forums etc.

once the image has uploaded click save to put it in an album.

Open the album and put cursor over the image.

A drop down box will appear, copy the whole line that starts with IMG.

In another tab on your computor start your post on HPMX.

When you want to add your pic right click and paste.

A line of text will appear in your post ( it wont be a pic but will turn into one when you post ).

Post on here and your pic will appear.

6hypo5conv_old · January 17, 2011 at 10:41 AM

Thanks Again Brant!! (and also Thank You Mark!!)

Brant, I'm putting together anouther small order to send your way, and the '65 wiper arms will be part of it!!

Thanks Again for your GREAT service!!

cobraboy · January 17, 2011 at 3:38 PM

I just looked at mine. I have the smooth type. Under these is a nut and a chrome angled spindle cover.

Car is April 1965 Dearborn FB

6hypo5conv_old · January 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM

Guys, I think I am all set now on my wipers.

I will get the correct blade holders from the member on the VMF that has offered them to me, and order the flanged repros from Brant.

Participate now!