Posts by s2ms

    65-early 66 GT350 radiators were typically stamped G2. I'm not sure if anyone has figured out yet why Shelby rads were stamped differently or if the G2 stamp was unique to them.

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    hmmmmm..

    no one knew about this 'gap?'....

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

    Dave,


    The "gap" is the setting for the clutch 'free play' travel. The complete procedure is described very well in the shop manual.


    Dave

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    I don't know that anyone will be able to supply an exact date. I do know that the wire clamps started showing up on the '66 GT350's by March '66-probably earlier.

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

    That's my impression as well. Hopefully Jeff will chime in on this, he has documented more San Jose cars than probably anyone.


    Dave

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    Centerforce I is plenty of clutch for a Hi-Po....

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

    I agree, don't think I'll ever use anything else.


    Dave

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    By interpulation (a Hi-Tech term), the scheduled built date would be Monday, January 18, 1965. If this block was from an "early" Shelby, it would have been snapped up by now by SAAC.

    Jim

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

    Not necessarily. I've emailed Howard a number of times regarding VIN stamped blocks for sale on ebay or various forums. Several of those times he was totally unaware of the situation and at least once the block in question did originally belong to a GT350.


    Dave

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    What I have are PosiLocks and not Polylocks and I have been running them for many years with stock chrome valve covers. They save me a lot of trouble with not having to adjust the valves as often.


    -Fred-

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

    Fred,


    I tend to think of PosiLocks and Polylocks as the same, or at least very similar, things. What is the difference in the ones you use?


    Thanks,

    Dave

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    You should take it apart to make sure White Post didn't put it together backwards. You'll know the first time you hit the brakes and they lock up. Oh, and hopefully it doesn't start leaking six months later like the one they rebuilt for me.

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

    I had White Post do mine about 9 years ago. It has performed great and I would not hesitate to use them again. They were recommended to me at the time by Cobra Automotive.

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    Most Hardware stores stock spring washers

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

    I agree with Jim. I rebuilt my original shifter linkage using hardware store wave washers slightly thicker than stock. Tightened things up considerably but still very smooth.

    I don't know about the Mobil-1 stuff as at a glance I didn't see a GL spec listed but I'll read more about it when I get a chance.


    Redline specifically calls for GL-4 for trannys due to the extra modifiers for synchros. They warn against using GL-5 gear oil, which does have the friction modifiers for limited slip diffs, as it is still too slippery for synchros. I went through this with one of their tech guys before switching to synthetic ~15 years ago.

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    You are not using synthetic gear oil now are you? I understand from David Kee that the Toploaders don't really like synthetic oil and were not designed to run with it.


    http://www.davidkeetoploaders.com

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    they certainly weren't designed for it as synthetics didn't exist back then, but...... When I mothballed my T-10 I put in a toploader that D. Kee had restored for me & initially used conventional gear oil. When it came time to change the trans. oil I decided to try Mobil 1 synthetic gear oil. It works fine for me. The warning from D. Kee states that it does work fine for some people, but not for others. The problem is supposed to be when shifting fast, the synthetic oil doesn't provide enough friction for the gear syncros to work properly. Apparently I'm so old I can't shift fast enough to induce this problem so I'm sticking with the synthetic oil for the reduced wear benefits.


    Z.


    Edited by - zrayrichter on 11/24/2010 10:32:21

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    Redline synthetic gear oils have different formulations for trannys than rear ends. The I've been using their MT-90, GL-4 spec, in my original close ratio T-10 for at least the last 15 years with great results. It has friction modifiers that allow for proper synchro function so (driver) age is not a factor. <img src=images/icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>


    http://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?pid=46&pcid=7