I don't think there will be a shortage here...I'm looking for opinions to help me make a decision. I have my own idea, and it seems very logical to me, but it never hurts to get other ideas. Here is the short story:
I have the 66 coupe/k/auto that my Dad bought new. If you search, you should find some pics. It needs a lot of work and I have next to no money. I have two kids that are in or going to college soon, so I have no dreams of completing/driving the car in the next 6-10 years.
I have split up the major work into three areas:
1. Collision damage and rusted out battery tray area.
2. Rusted cowl area.
3. Rusted floor pans.
1. I just had repaired. Core support and inner apron below battery were PROPERLY (read expensive) repaired as factory. The driver side was 3/4 inch high and 1/4 inch pushed to the rear. This pulled easy and is not much damage (according to the body man). This was from the collision damage.
2 and 3 are the areas in question.
The opinion needed is for this: Let the car sit and continue in decline. The rust is getting bad in the floors. OR sell a few parts that are original to the car to help finance some repairs in order to slow/stop further structural damage? Even though this will not pay for #2 and #3, it will help get #2 done, which should slow down #3 damage.
Parts are:
1. Fan
2. Dizzy
3. Intake manifold
4. Exhaust manifolds
Given: I realize that once these parts are gone, I will never get them back again. Also, the original engine (block/crank/rods/heads) were damaged and replaced back in 1969, so they are long gone also. Since I was only 6 years of age at the time, I was not consulted regarding thier disposition.![]()
For the next 6 months to year the car will continue to be stored outside. I should have a garage spot available soon to keep it out of the elements. It is drivable now, as far as moving from here to there. I drove it (mostly stock 289 rebuild) the 2 miles from the storage lot to the body shop.