Posts by BiffF15

  • 1965 GT KCODE

    SFRED,

    The car looks great from the pictures on the web site. Obviously the more experienced guys will give additional advice however I would recommend getting the KCode book for sale elsewhere on this site. There are several good points the book will bring up in identifying a true K-Code.

    The only thing that seems a little funny is the add never mentions if the car is a true GT as well or not. That's an additional 5k plus or minus of value / cost. KAR Mustang has a couple of good articles on determining if a car is a true GT. I have seen the Forristall adds before making a big deal out of a "factory" GT which would make me beg the question.

    Get as smart as possible before "seeing" a car to avoid buyers remorse.

    Damon

  • dynacorn

    I get about a dozen car mag's every month, and I thought one of them said that Dynacorn was also going to make 65/66 and "other" Mustang bodies. I could be wrong, anyone else read that?

    I think it's great that someone would go through the trouble of making these bodies. However I also think it's VERY important that the buyer of a "vintage car" know exactly what parts (the body for instance) are what. Passing off one of these bodies as something other that what it is would be terribly wrong.

  • What are matching #'s

    Dave,

    Thanks for posting the pictures, they answered all my questions! I had looked all over for the "remaining" numbers to no avail. It never dawned on me they would be hidden by the fender lip or just slightly visible from the wheel well. I have read the 4th edition K code book and it's not clear or I'm just a tad slow...

    Thanks,

    Damon

  • Seatbelt anchor points

    Time to display my ignorance. I have a 66 FB with no rear seatbelts. I have removed the back seat yet can only find the inboard holes (those nearest the trans tunnel) for the seat belts. Does anyone have a picture, drawing, etc that would show me where those missing, outboard "holes" are?

    Thanks,

    Damon