Posts by 66Paxtang_old

    Odd how they painted the car with the fenders on, guess the extra paint on the inner fenders would make the VIN stamp look like it was near the correct location. Seems to be several inches from it's normal location

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    Pics on ebay: looks like a small vibration damper.


    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    Small pulley on alternator as well...

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    Also isn't that rally pack designed for the 65 speedo? Shouldn't the correct one not have the tall bridge?

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    If this is considered fraud does one consider it the same thing to stamp your VIN in your engine block? Page 6 of the 289 HIPO book 2nd edition calls this a restoration not a forgery.


    Thoughts/

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    I believe if you read the statement made in the HIPO book 4th edition the stamping of the VIN on the block was in fact restamping a faded VIN. That's what was meant by restoration. To stamp your engine block with a VIN if it wasn't there is fraud. I wouuld be very suprised if Tony was advocating this.


    Regards,


    René

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    I guess I need to get the forth edition, the second states and I quote, "If your HP block is damaged, a standard black that bears the same one of the above casting numbers can be converted to a Hi-Po. Use the HP main bearing caps and have it line bored. There is no difference, however, if our car originally had a VIN stamped block you will have to reproduce the stamping. This is not forgery, this is restoration."


    Clearly the comment is not regarding a faded VIN number nor am I suggesting it is a good thing to do, only pointing out there is or has been gray areas when it comes to these items.


    Oh and the comment on the Mona Lisa and the frame was funny.

    If this is considered fraud does one consider it the same thing to stamp your VIN in your engine block? Page 6 of the 289 HIPO book 2nd edition calls this a restoration not a forgery.


    Thoughts/

    Given that it has a 65 VIN it does have one item that would lead me to believe it could be a GT. The fact that the opening for the instrument cluster is stamped (factory cut out) to accept the larger round 66 or 65GT speedometer. This was only on a 65 GT or all 66 cars, GT or not.


    My two cents.

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    O agree with Gene - warn parts is very likely.

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    I have heard that problem is more common in the BW T-10 which is what i have in my non-k fastback with the same problem.


    So it is also common in a warn Toploader?

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>


    Anyone else out there have an AC story?

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    My car has AC, but the balancer was changed to use a standard ford pulley either during the last restoration or in the very beginning when the AC was installed. Whom ever did the job whether dealer or not did a really nice job. I had planed on keeping it in but after reading your thoughts might take it out.


    Edited by - 66Paxtang on 02/09/2007 20:15:48

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    I agree with Ralph on this. I have one that is 16,000 units in front of this one and mine is November 7, 1964.

    -Fred-

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    I'm 10K in front with a December 64 build. Does it matter that mine is a convertible?


    Any comments on the aircon? Was it a dealer option or could you get order it with air?

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    Scratch that last comment. I'm 10K AFTER and have a December 64 build!

    5F8K375XXX


    Michael

    <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

    I agree with Ralph on this. I have one that is 16,000 units in front of this one and mine is November 7, 1964.

    -Fred-

    <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>


    I'm 10K in front with a December 64 build. Does it matter that mine is a convertible?


    Any comments on the aircon? Was it a dealer option or could you get order it with air?