Hello Scott, my K coupe has a June 8th 64 biuld date with two rear brake hose mount brackets, we could e mail each other pics for reference, regards chuck. jjz109@msn.comQuote from FXguyHey Brant, sent you the pic by email of the brake hose bracket on my first week June 64 scheduled build K vert. Please feel free to post here.
-Scott
Posts by chucks302
-
-
Hi fred, my 64.5 K coupe has two brackets also ,i e- mailed them to brent earlier this evening perhaps he could post them for me as i have not had luck in getting pictures on the site, chuck.Quote from C6ZZKGTBrent, as an addendum to this post, I am restoring a 66 Hipo fastback C4 Kar that has both rear brake hose brackets present and it utilizes the normal dual exhaust brake line setup. It is a Dearborn Kar with a California 71 DSO.
-Fred-
-
QuoteDisplay More
Brent, i will e mail you pictures of my june 64 built K coupe rear brake hose brackets & frame rail area, feel free to post the pictures on the site, chuck.
Please take a look at your HiPo Mustang's Rear Brake Hose and mount if your car was scheduled to be produced in 1964, particularly September of '64 and earlier.
Normally, the dual exhaust equipped cars are assumed to have the "L" Bracket mount for the rear brake hose for "clearance" with the factory dual exhaust. (Please note that the earlier cars do not even have an indentation in the floor pan for the location of the bracket.) Along with this, of course, is the brake hose itself with a bracket.
Anyway, the earlier production cars have the rear brake hose mount normally considered to be only on the single exhaust cars, but I'm not sure which brake hose these particular cars used.
If you have an earlier car, please take a look. The hose, of course, may have been changed over the years, but the bracket usually would not have been. I am trying to determine when the bracket change was made and which brake hose was used on these earlier cars.
The image shown here is of a Dearborn produced HiPo Convertible with a scheduled build date of August 10, 1964. BTW, this car was, of course, originally equipped with the early transverse dual exhaust system also.
[Blocked Image: http://lh5.ggpht.com/_FhFCoO_tIME/SowVaLYEGwI/AAAAAAAAHLM/PYw-AsB-uSI/s800/DSCN8613a.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://lh5.ggpht.com/_FhFCoO_tIME/SowVa8Kxt4I/AAAAAAAAHLU/lgRQreFDPoc/s800/Brake-Hose.jpg]
-
Quote from club 33Display More
Please take a look at your HiPo Mustang's Rear Brake Hose and mount if your car was scheduled to be produced in 1964, particularly September of '64 and earlier.
Normally, the dual exhaust equipped cars are assumed to have the "L" Bracket mount for the rear brake hose for "clearance" with the factory dual exhaust. (Please note that the earlier cars do not even have an indentation in the floor pan for the location of the bracket.) Along with this, of course, is the brake hose itself with a bracket. Hello Brant, i will be e mail you pictures and info of my early 64.5 K coupe reaqr brake hose brackets and related rear frame rail plates , regards chuck.
Anyway, the earlier production cars have the rear brake hose mount normally considered to be only on the single exhaust cars, but I'm not sure which brake hose these particular cars used.
If you have an earlier car, please take a look. The hose, of course, may have been changed over the years, but the bracket usually would not have been. I am trying to determine when the bracket change was made and which brake hose was used on these earlier cars.
The image shown here is of a Dearborn produced HiPo Convertible with a scheduled build date of August 10, 1964. BTW, this car was, of course, originally equipped with the early transverse dual exhaust system also.
[Blocked Image: http://lh5.ggpht.com/_FhFCoO_tIME/SowVaLYEGwI/AAAAAAAAHLM/PYw-AsB-uSI/s800/DSCN8613a.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://lh5.ggpht.com/_FhFCoO_tIME/SowVa8Kxt4I/AAAAAAAAHLU/lgRQreFDPoc/s800/Brake-Hose.jpg]
-
Mark, the breather is the small pin hole in the raised dimple on the top cover, the cover gasket also has a vent hole, chuck.
-
If the D was a B would that indicate that it was from the Buffalo NY ford stamping plantQuote from cobraboy2 = Month = February
24 = day = 24th
D = Dearborn stamping plant
2 = Shft = 2nd shift of the day
-
Yes it will work i did the opposite , i ran my 70 Boss 302 engine on a stand with a 289 fuel pump, chuck.
-
I would check the shifter mount bolts and the shifter adjustment also , after a first run it may need adjustment.
-
if the heads do not have factory cast in spring pockets and factory screw in studs they are not K code heads they are modified standard 289 heads, Chuck.Quote from UnicornToday I was looking at a Hipo engine. Instead of the screw in studs they were pinned. I had never heard of those before. The same fellow also had a standard 289 head with a 20 casting . I was always told 19,20&21 nubers refered to hipo heads. Any comments?
-
Welcome to the site , good luck with the fastback, chuck.
-
Price reduced $1300 + shipping, contact chuck jjz109@msn.com
-
I have located the fender aprons i needed , Chuck.
-
Im looking for a right front & right rear 65-66 nos inner fender aprons , contact jjz109@msn.com , thanks Chuck.
-
Hello Greg, what are the date codes on the heads, chuck.Quote from Fast FordsI have a pair of 289 hipo heads for sale.These heads are competition race prepped for Shelby American by Valley Head Service.The heads are stamped "porting and polishing by Valley Head Service in Canoga Park CA". Both heads are stamped and have a work order number stamped on each head which is 386-1 and 386-2.Price is $2000 obo plus shipping.If interested,email gmurphy@mountaincable.net for pics and more detail.Thanks...Greg
-
Ron i will call you tomorrow morning, chuck.
-
Ron i sent you a pm about the spacers, chuck.
-
Thanks for the reply Dave, i can see the heater hoses in the picture but not the pcv vacume hose route, i think they were ported to the rear of the intake manifold because there is no carb spacer that a cast iron 289 intake would have when a 4100 autolite carb is used , i have a 4100 autolite with a shelby intake without carb spacer to connect the pcv hose . chuckQuote from s2msDisplay MoreChuck,
The picture below is from a 65 GT350 but the hose routing is the same for 66 and 67. Depending on the year the PCV valve wil either be the hex base, non-threaded C5AE stamped valve shown in the picture or the round body C6AE stamped valve, possibly a C7 valve for later 67's. Sometime in late 66 Ford swithced to the round body PCV valves.
Dave
[Blocked Image: http://www.1965gt350mustang.com/images/5s114_06.jpg]
-
What would be the correct pcv valve & hose routing for a 66-67 GT350 with a Holley or 4100 autolite carb ,
-
Welcome to the site Bill, its good to have an engineer from that time period to share tech info and memories about the cars, myself being a ford dealership line mechanic for 25+years and working from time to time with ford field engineers on problem vehicles you guys know your stuff, Chuck.
-
Thank you , i have one like yours and suspected it was a restamp . regards chuck.Quote from s2msDisplay MoreChuck,
Mine are in a single line:
[Blocked Image: http://www.1965gt350mustang.com/temp/springs.jpg]
Dave
